Well, hello every One and welcome to the Super Natural ‘Son’ Day Re-View and pre-View of the Good News Journal, thank King or Queen You for joining Me, Your moral highness is always welcome. However, moral bankruptcy is the topic of today’s Post because that’s all Canada’s State Actors seem to be able to Show Us! Not one individual working for the City of Ottawa seems to have an ounce of compassion, competence, or integrity – they are legitimately morally bankrupt degenerates who behave more like they were raised in a barn or home schooled by the village idiot than ‘Trusted’, ‘Honourable’, public servants – they don’t have an Honourable bone in their body!
Every State Actor employed by Home for Good including the project manager, Jason Cooke knows they have claimed and received funds for utilities for a Beneficiary that never made it into the Hand of the Beneficiary. The project manager hasn’t even apologized or expressed embarrassment for the incompetence of his criminal clowns posing as public servants because he’s more concerned about keeping untrustworthy State Actors employed and covering his own ass than he is in making sure the Benefits end up where they were earmarked to go to correct their wrongdoing. Apparently, when the going gets tough, Jason the Cowardly Criminal Cooke gets under his desk and hopes the problem Will go away and forget about him. He’s the One keeping these clowns employed and failing to provide remedy, so he can be held accountable in his personal, private capacity for aggravating the harm done by the criminal negligence of his clowns posing as public servants.
Keep in Mind that aggravated circumstances are not a joke when it comes to breaching Trust, either. If One is found guilty of breaching Trust and is found to have been conspiring with others to carry out their crime, the Judge issuing the Sentence must take into account aggravating circumstances. Circumstances are ‘aggravated’ depending on how long the conspiracy was carried out, the profession of the individual and their relevance to the crime perpetrated.
For example, this crime would not be possible without several public servants (State Actors) being Trusted with the Beneficiary’s consent to obtain private, personal information pertaining to his income for the purpose of ensuring necessary funds are approved and rent is always in Good standing. The consent was Given in Good Faith and not for any other purpose (*relevance to ‘without prejudice’). The consent was instead used to secure additional funds for the Beneficiary’s utilities that were never used to pay the Beneficiary’s utilities and currently in the hands of the landlord or City of Ottawa staff to the tune of at least $2280.00. This also means that Jason the Courteous Criminal Cooke failed to notice that the City of Ottawa received an extra $720.00 for rent that allegedly (according to Sarah the Liar Lorenz of MHI) did not end up in the Hands of the landlord, either. As project manager, Jason the Courteous Criminal Cooke failed to Notice a surplus of $2160.00 in over payments from the Housing Authority for three years (and makes another claim for the same this year, so working on number four). He hasn’t even apologized yet? We’re supposed to presume he’s not complicit and covering for his criminal clowns posing as public servants? Does that seem reasonable or correct to You? Rhetorical. No. I don’t think a Divisional Court Will think so, either. In order for this grift to be going on for at least three years and working on number four, Jason the Courteous Criminal Cooke would either have to be complicit or completely incompetent as ‘project manager’ for the Home for Good program. He obviously lacks the leadership and accounting experience necessary to competently fulfill his duties and obligations as a public servant.
Of course, the same is True for every One at Ontario Works. Ontario Works was telling the Beneficiary he is not entitled to funds to support additional housing expenses like utilities and rental insurance, they must come out of the basic needs portion of Benefits, depriving the Beneficiary of sufficient wealth to provide for his actual basic needs, ‘Contra Bonos Mores’, or ‘Against Good Morals’. I don’t Mind telling People that this is in fact precisely why some People prefer to be homeless. If One is homeless, at least they can afford to eat because they don’t have any other expenses. They want newly housed People to pay additional utilities, rental insurance and in many cases also a phone (because many places use intercom to accept visitors into the building, so it’s essential), leaving the average individual with less than $200.00 for food and everything else One can think of to cover ‘basic needs’ (You don’t have furniture yet, cleaning supplies, clothing allowance, laundry expenses, internet and television if any are lucky enough to afford the luxury, toiletries, a bed, linens, curtains, et cetera). Ontario Works is a provincial program but the staff working in Ottawa are considered City of Ottawa staff (just like Home for Good). They were providing accurate details of the Beneficiary’s utilities so that the City of Ottawa could receive funds for them from the Housing Authority and pleaded ignorance the whole time. They Wish to claim they have ‘no idea’ what’s going on with Home for Good staff unless it’s to help them secure funds for utilities they are not paying. Ontario Works ‘had no idea’ that’s why they were as King how much the Beneficiary pays for utilities and had no idea the City of Ottawa has been receiving funds for those utilities for over four years? If they didn’t that, they would be tickled pink to find out about it, not doubling down on their deceit and fraud as Lili the Malevolent Moron Mukalay is doing. Engaging in more fraud by reducing the shelter portion of Benefits the Beneficiary is Entitled to receive when learning of HFG’s fraud to offset the money they were planning to steal while continuing to gaslight their obligation to pay his utilities. She has to be one of the stupidest women I have ever met aside from Clara the Freakshow Freier who was bold enough to tell Me that Canada’s Criminal Code and the Trustee Act of Ontario is not binding on her or any of her agents. Stupid is as stupid does.
Here’s the top Posts this week, though!
Oh, and let’s not forget this one!!!
Only a pedophile would forgive a pedophile because it might affect his citizenship. He may as well have just offered him a red carpet, champagne, cavier and let him to the executive quarters of the Judiciary where he might find a King size bed and a fifteen year old girl dressed in lingerie waiting for him. For Paul, the Pedo-Protector Thomas O’marra, it’s a just another potential customer for their elite, child sex trafficking trade. Paul the Pedo-Protector Thomas O’marra was inviting him into their club with his decision while simultaneously Giving an international nod to the World Economic Forum to let them know Canada’s Courts are secure for their sex trafficking activities and welcoming immigrants with a penchant for children.
Honestly, does any other Canadian make any other decision? Most People would be thrilled to know that being convicted of soliciting a minor for sex in Canada Will have One denied entry into Canada. This judge is making sure that this pedophile does NOT get denied access into Canada!!! He specifically states that being the reason for his decision and leniency. If Canadian’s don’t understand that this is how the Courts ‘publicly’ gain consent to engage in criminal conduct… This is how they plan to set precedence for legalized pedophilia. Legal Will never be Lawful. They are letting You know the Courts are run by genocidal maniacs (Antonini setting precedence for genocide) and pedophiles.
Well, that’s all for today, Ladies and Lords of Your respected House. Tomorrow I am planning on doing a Post on the Good News of Man’s Macrocosm and sharing some of the content I feel is most important for Universal Pictures Greatest Present a Sean.
Love and Blessings,
*Post Script – ‘Without Prejudice’. I’ve talked about ‘without prejudice’ before and mentioned that it can be a Good idea to Write ‘without prejudice’ on any contract One Signs to ensure they do not use the contract in ‘bad faith’ or for something contrary to why the consent was Given. One of the reasons it’s not really necessary is because it is very unlikely that the One using the contract in bad faith Will try to tell a Court that One gave consent to use it in bad faith. Nonetheless, it is a protection in the event One is dealing with notorious criminal clowns from the City of Ottawa who like to use the Courts as a cloak for their fraud.
Discover more from The Kingdom of Heaven Found a Sean
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.