Ottawa and Virtual Crown’s Continuous Contempt and Registry Fraud

Hello every One and welcome to the Fabulous Free Lance Friday Edition, thank King or Queen You for joining Me, it is always a Pleasure to be Gifted with Your Presence. Today Will be a shorter Post than usual, especially for a Free Lance Friday when I Love to wield My Words even more fearlessly than usual. Fortuna Fortis Aduivat – Fortune Favours the Brave. Also, ‘Vraus Omnia Vitiate’, or ‘Fraud Vitiates Everything’… Such as Registry fraud, ‘Take II’, for example.

THIS is why I can’t find the charges on the public Registry! This is Registry fraud. Deliberate, intentional Registry fraud where the name on the charging information is different than that which was entered onto the system (Registry) and (more importantly) what I was told the name of the file was. Does One really Wish to believe that a prosecutor working for the Crown Attorney’s office doesn’t know that the name entered onto the public Registry must match the name of the charging information, or that entering a hyphen Will change the name on the Registry?

And just in case You think it’s because the hyphen is necessary as a ‘place holder’ or something because the Registry can’t accept spaces… Uh, no…. That’s My ‘real’ name in a Court proceeding below. It should appear exactly the same in a criminal matter because there is only one of Me in the Court Registry – and that person doesn’t have a hyphen in their last name.

Why does it not come up in a search result for ‘von Dehn’ or ‘VON DEHN’ (use of all caps really does not matter whatsoever in the Court case look up tool, both Will bring up the same information)? Because it is a completely different entity, just like ‘VONDEHN’ is a completely separate entity from ‘von Dehn’, which is the name they used to proceed against Me with on the Registry last time (2019 Christopher Mathew Jenkyns, #2209)!

With the exception of ALL CAPS, the name on the information was correct (von Dehn) but the name they entered onto the Registry was ‘VONDEHN’! The system does not recognize ‘VONDEHN’ as being even remotely similar to ‘VON DEHN’, so nothing related to ‘von Dehn’ is going to show up or get flagged by the Registry related to that name! So now when they run My prints, the name ‘VONDEHN’ comes up as well because they literally created a new legal entity on the Registry with a different name!!! It appears they are going for a third last name to Create finger prints for on the Registry, ‘VON-DEHN’! Make no mistake about it, the name on the Registry is the actual name they are proceeding against, which is completely different than the name on the inform a Sean. If Crown were to get a convict-Sean, it’s VON-DEHN that is going to develop the new criminal record, not ‘VON DEHN’ as they have on the information because that’s not the name on the Registry, just like it was ‘VONDEHN’ the charges were withdrawn against (stayed), not ‘VON DEHN’ as it was on the information. The Title of the document looked correct, but they used a different name (VONDEHN) when they placed it on the Registry (processed with the Court Registrar). Now an entirely new artificial, fake entity comes up when they run My prints. Lovely.

It is also not normal for a Court to not return emails – that is contempt! No lawyer is going to convince Me that ‘ghosting’ Me for four months when I’m as King why I can’t find this on the Registry and not telling Me it’s because they used a different name when they filed it with the Registry. We saw this fraud before at 100 Constellation Avenue and none of those charges showed up in the criminal background check, did they? I wonder why. Oh, right, because they were proceeding against ‘VON-DEHN’ on the Registry and ‘VON DEHN’ in the information they served Me with – they don’t have prints for VON-DEHN yet (but they appear to be trying). They couldn’t tell Me why I couldn’t find the information because I would know they were using the same trick as before.

They were proceeding against ‘VON-DEHN’ in the system which doesn’t show up when You type in the correct, ‘von Dehn’. This allows them to set up a mock court off the Record where they can do whatever the fuck they want, even pay themselves $6280. for the pleasure of interfering with Justice in a Civil proceeding before the Superior Court. Fucking cunts.

But I can tell You that apparently they are allowed to use a record that goes back to 1992 and if that Record is within five years of a youth record, the youth record becomes part of the adult Record. I misunderstood the legislation in that regard which said that a youth record could not be used against an adult if it was more than five years ago (which is True), but an adult record can and the youth record becomes part of that adult record as far as the legislation is concerned if it’s within five years of the last adult record. However, bringing it up in a Release Order hearing is still in very bad taste and appears malicious.

I Will tell You that I discussed strategy with My lawyer today and I am so far very pleased with his counsel, though his counsel is not to share that strategy with My audience here, which is more or less what I have previously disclosed to You. So, unfortunately, I won’t have much more for You on that front, but I do still have unfinished business with the City of Ottawa and the contempt of their court clerks intercepting My civil filings.

Multifaith Housing Initiative once again proves that complaining about their negligence and contempt for their tenants here does not go unnoticed, as they have responded to My complaint of their surveillance community with an explain a Sean…

Okay, so let Me get this straight… You don’t have money for security cameras for tenants so they can see who Wishes to buzz into the building but You DO have sufficient funds for security cameras to monitor the garbage area for Your own benefit and only for the purpose of policing garbage dumpsters? Well, I’m not sure if that’s more or less insulting than before. Garbage is now officially more valuable and a greater priority to Multifaith Housing Initiative than the safety of their tenants. Bravo, MHI!!! Narcissistic social posturing at its absolute finest, Sahada!

I also sent a final email to the City’s liar posing as lawyer, Genevieve Langlais as King of her if she’s going to repay the money she stole from the Beneficiary or compel Me to bring (another) claim against the City. She replied to say that the City had already repaid what they stole ($1018.00) which is a far cry from what the Entitlement Forms say they stole.

See, the problem with engaging in fraud, is that One generally has to produce more fraud to cover over the initial fraud… Like filing under new names so as not to alert the Registry to what One is doing, to engage in a multiplicity of suits against the same person under different names. That is Registry fraud, or identity fraud if One prefers.

My personal belief, is that every single one of the Entitlement Forms produced by Home for Good was produced in fraud – likely over the two week period I was demanding to see them. But Multifaith Housing Initiative has been withholding receipts from Me in violation of the Residential Tenancies Act because if I had receipts, they would show that Home for Good cut off subsidy without Notice to Me three years out of five, trying to evict Me for non payment of rent, with huge lump-sum payments being made to restore the account to Good standing, authorized by Yours Truly. They never admit to any wrongdoing, so they can’t let Me have evidence they breached My Trust and cut off subsidy without Notice to Me, so the next best thing is to doctor the Entitlement Forms, right?

The Entitlement Forms show that Multifaith Housing Initiative has been receiving rent payments like clockwork! Miraculously, rent doesn’t ever appear to have been cut off, and the subsidy included both rental insurance and utilities in exactly the amount the Beneficiary happened to be paying from his basic needs! Imagine that! And, just to add insult to injury, Ontario Works case workers defiantly lied to the Beneficiary for over six years, telling him he was not entitled to any utility or rental insurance funds as part of the housing subsidy while they were claiming it on his behalf so they could give it to his landlord!!! Fucking cunts, I tell You!

So when the City of Ottawa’s liar posing as lawyer told Me that the City repaid $1018 and considers the Matter resolved, annd to consult a lawyer if I am not satisfied with the reply, I advised her that I very much Will be hiring a lawyer because failing to provide the Beneficiary with the Benefits he is Entitled to receive right now, is theft of public money and a breach of public Trust, with clear and deliberate malicious intent to cause harm. There is absolutely no ‘Good reason’ why a Trustee Acting in Good Faith would not Wish to provide every penny a Beneficiary is Entitled to receive except to cause him harm. You were okay to Give the utilities Benefit the Beneficiary was paying to My landlord, but not to the Beneficiary it was intended for and You think that is going to sit well with a Judge? Good luck, Gen.

Surprisingly, she actually responded to Me this morning to say she is discussing the Matter with City of Ottawa staff and Will get back to Me shortly. No Word yet, I wonder what she Will have to say. I am not bluffing about hiring (another) lawyer.

Love and Blessings,