Canada’s Clown Show Continues: Jason the Courteous Criminal Cooke Confirms HFG and MHI ‘Kickback Scheme’ is Four Years Strong, Part II

Hello every One and welcome to the Sensei Sean all Saturday Edition, thank King or Queen You for joining Me, Your Presence is a welcome Gift in My House. Well, We’re not sure if Jason the Courteous Criminal Cooke has just inadvertently shot all of his colleagues at Home for Good in the back, or if there is a more complex and involved strategy behind providing Me with four years worth of evidence showing his ‘team’ have been taking advantage of Beneficiaries by claiming to pay utilities they don’t pay and have no intention of paying. They were using the information obtained by Ontario Works to determine how much the Beneficiary was paying for utilities from the ‘basic needs’ portion of Ontario Works so that they could claim those funds for themselves.

To add insult to injury, I have been protesting the automatic deductions from the basic needs portion of the Beneficiary’s Ontario Works, asserting that utilities are part of the shelter cost incurred when obtaining housing and should be included as part of the Housing subsidy the Beneficiary is Entitled to receive from the City. I made the same assertions regarding apartment insurance. Meanwhile, Ontario Works argued with Me on these points while they were receiving one of these Entitlement forms every year, Showing the Beneficiary is Entitled to receive funding for both rent and utilities! Not only did Ontario Works know that I was correct, they were providing that information to Home for Good and My landlord so that they could receive those funds instead (knowing they are not using them to pay utilities) while continuing to take those funds from the basic needs portion of his Ontario Works Benefit, effectively depriving the beneficiary of wealth essential to for basic needs.

Yesterday I shared all of the Entitlement Notices Home for Good have used to secure subsidy for the Beneficiary. They have been claiming to pay $60 in utilities for the Beneficiary since June of 2022. That is a complete fabrication – they’ve been putting that money in their own pocket while Ontario Works simultaneous lies to Me and tells Me it’s not covered by the subsidy the Beneficiary is Entitled to receive. Really? That’s not what the Entitlement forms they received every year for the same Beneficiary say. Presumably Home for Good were sending a copy of each of these Entitlement forms to Ontario Works for their Records because they are also required to maintain a copy of this Entitlement form to show what the Beneficiary is Entitled to receive from the City in the way of housing supports.

Despite knowing the Beneficiary is Entitled to receive subsidy for both utilities and rental insurance, they lied to the Beneficiary while making sure the money the city of Ottawa received for the Beneficiary’s utilities went directly into the landlord’s pocket instead. They’ve literally been using the consent that was provided to communicate between organizations to take advantage of the Beneficiary, exploit him economically and enrich themselves by placing the money in their own pocket. They are supposed to use the consent provided to Act in the Beneficiary’s best interest and make sure that he is receiving all of the Benefits he is rightly Entitled to receive. Instead, they have been using that Trust to exploit the Beneficiary for their own personal, financial gain and psychopathic amusement.

I said I Wished to demonstrate exactly how much of Jason’s reply to Me is ‘gaslighting’. We numbered Our questions to Jason and We’re going to see how many of Our questions he was able to answer after having more than two weeks to prepare.

Here are the last questions We were as King of Jason to answer. Let’s see how many he answers.

1. Why did it take two weeks to produce a document when Revenue Canada requires You to maintain accurate records of all Your accounting, including applications and supporting documents for subsidies?
2. Why is this the first year that the Beneficiary is receiving an Entitlement form?
3. Where are the Entitlement Forms for 2024, 2023, 2022, and 2021?
4. Why is Home for Good and the landlord, MHI claiming to pay utilities in the amount of $60 when both organizations know they are doing no such thing?
5. How did Home for Good learn that the Beneficiary was paying $60 in utilities?
6. Are Home for Good employees above the Law?
7. Do You believe criminal breach of Trust and fraud with intent to steal funds from the public Trust is an acceptable degree of criminal negligence for Your office and staff?
8. I can’t think of one time that Kelly Kritsch, Sana Abou-Araf, Celia North, Christine Amero, or any One else at Your office ever answered a question I’ve asked them honestly.  Do You pride Your self on hiring criminals and incompetent liars, or have I just had an exceptionally unusual experience with Your staff?

1. He says individual responsible for these forms was away, only returned yesterday and wanted to speak to them first (sounds like a pathetic excuse, but at least it’s something)
2. Claims he is not providing the Beneficiary with a copy of the Entitlement forms because ‘he doesn’t fill them out’ – so Jason perceives that to mean that he doesn’t have to let the Beneficiary know what he is Entitled to receive. This is an answer, but it’s also gaslighting because they are required to provide one of these to the Beneficiary every year regardless who fills out the form! They are also required to send a copy to Ontario Works so that they know what the Beneficiary is Entitled to receive. (The real reason they didn’t send a copy of these forms is because I would be able to show that the Beneficiary is Entitled to receive funds for utilities and rental insurance.)
3. He did provide (fraudulent and fabricated) forms for the years in question.
4. Not answered.
5. By using the consent form provided by the Beneficiary to discover how much he was paying in utilities from Ontario Works so that they could claim that money to put in their own pockets instead.
6. Not answered.
7. Not answered.
8. Not answered.

So Jason doesn’t tell Me if his staff are above the Law or explain why no One is being charged for this criminal breach of Trust that was clearly used to take advantage of the Beneficiary’s subsidy for their own personal gain. We’ll have to try as King Jason those questions a second time.

The most stupendous gaslighting example demonstrated by Jason is that he provides these Entitlement Notices like he’s just won the lottery or saved his delinquent department. Does he not realize that he just proved that his office have been taking advantage of the Beneficiary for their own personal gain for over five years? Does he not realize that MHI and HFG have NEVER paid any utilities for the Beneficiary? I mean, if he doesn’t know that then I can completely understand his reply. But where would he get the idea that MHI or HFG are paying utilities when he has explicitly told Me he obtained that figure by communicating with Ontario Works to find out how much the Beneficiary was paying for utilities. Did they ever use the consent provided to them to advise Ontario Works that they should not be taking utilities from his basic needs because they are receiving funding for that from the City? No, of course not! They just put the money in their own pocket.

Jason the Courteous Criminal Cooke answered more questions than most People do, but it’s still not a proper, professional reply. He should be numbering his answers to Me. He didn’t because if he had, he’d have also had to leave fifty percent of his answers blank. He doesn’t Wish to tell Me why his team are claiming to pay utilities they are not paying, he doesn’t Wish to tell Me whether or not his staff are above the Law, he doesn’t Wish to tell Me if this degree of criminal negligence is an ‘acceptable’ level of fraud for his team and City employees, and he doesn’t Wish to let Me know if this criminal malfeasance is typical behaviour for his department or just some freak accident. We Will soon know the answers to all of these questions because if they are genuine, honourable individuals with integrity, they Will acknowledge their wrongdoing, insist it was some kind of freak error (not intentional), and make sure every penny they received for utilities is paid out to the Beneficiary as soon as possible.

If they don’t acknowledge their wrongdoing and continue to insist this is all perfectly normal and they’ve done nothing wrong, then We know their intent was malicious. They used consent provided to them by the Beneficiary (in Good Faith) to communicate with Ontario Works and used that consent to take advantage of him by claiming utilities for themselves while the Beneficiary continued to pay them from his basic needs while both organizations continued to gaslight the Beneficiary and tell him that utilities are not part of the shelter allowance portion of Benefits he is Entitled to! The moral bankruptcy of these maggots is astounding!!!

Ontario Works can’t plead ignorance anymore because Jason has confirmed they have been in communication with Ontario Works since at least 2021 discussing the Housing Subsidy in detail. Also, Ontario Works is supposed to have a copy of each of these Entitlement Forms every year, too – so they can’t say they didn’t know that the Beneficiary was Entitled to have his utilities paid from the shelter portion of Benefits he receives from Ontario Works because they have a form stating that fact specifically. If the Beneficiary (who is supposed to receive a copy of these forms every year) is required to send a copy to his case worker at Ontario Works to let them know what he’s entitled to receive from the City, then Home for Good has the same obligation if they were not providing a copy to the Beneficiary. Again, just because the Beneficiary is not the one filling out the form doesn’t mean he’s no longer entitled to know what is being claimed on his behalf! Especially when the public Trustee is a criminal actively exploiting the individual economically for their own economic gain.

I can’t hardly wait to see what they do now. Will they double down on their fraud and theft of public money, or Will they agree to pay back what they stole and come clean on their fraud?

Time Will tell. Here are My ‘interim’ replies to Jason. I Will send a proper reply sometime Monday morning and Will probably draft the email sometime tomorrow, starting a new email thread which Will include Lili the Malevolent Moron Mukalay and Mathieu Regimbald just to ensure they are no longer able to plead ignorance of Benefits the Beneficiary is Entitled to receive, nor can they claim they didn’t know I was correct for the last five years, taking money from the basic needs portion of Benefits unlawfully to engage in fraud.

Love and Blessings,