Hello every One and welcome to the Fabulous Free Lance Friday Edition and what a Fabulous Friday it is in Deeds!!! I can’t be one hundred percent sure that this public a Sean is responsible for Jason the Courteous Criminal Cooke providing Me with almost precisely what I was as King of him for, but I can tell You that he proved Me wrong! I said yesterday in My Post that I predicted I would either hear nothing at all, or Jason ‘the Contemptuous’ Criminal Cooke would provide Me with everything but the documents I was as King of him for. Well, he did prove Me wrong. He responded to Me at 4:56 this afternoon, four minutes sooner than the latest I had expected to hear from him. I was correct about him not providing a copy of the supporting documents they provided to the Housing Authority with their applications, but Jason ‘the Courteous’ Criminal Cooke was instead forthcoming about how he obtained the information that was used to secure the subsidy, conceding that he used the consent I had provided to HFG to communicate with the Beneficiary’s case worker at Ontario Works to verify income as necessary to ensure the Beneficiary continues to qualify for the subsidy. That was how Home for Good was able to discover that the Beneficiary was also paying $60/month in utilities from the basic needs portion of Ontario Works, so they decided to claim to be paying that amount as well so they could put the money in their own pocket! Yes, Ladies and Gentle-Men, Kings and Queens, it is another Fabulous Free Lance Friday Edition, thank Your Royal, Moral Highness for being here, Your Presence is always a Treasured Gift in My House.
The reason Jason is now the ‘Courteous’ Criminal Cooke is because he does not appear to be dodging accountability and did (mostly) Keep his Word. He is certainly demonstrating far less contempt than his predecessors at Home for Good. But the reason I Wish to share My last email to him with You is to Show that I numbered My questions to him ‘to see how many You are capable of answering’ to further demonstrate how State Actors like to ‘gaslight’.
Here is Jason the Courteous Criminal Cooke’s reply, received four minutes before the end of the standard business week, 4:56 PM on Friday afternoon. Effectively four minutes before he promised to respond. I Give credit where credit is due, I appreciate him getting back to Me and providing Me with the most critical information (evidence) necessary to prove My case within the time frame promised.
However, he is still just a more courteous criminal! He has just conceded to breaching the Beneficiary’s Trust by using a consent form he provided to communicate with Ontario Works and the landlord to determine rent and utility costs so that they could claim to be paying utilities they know the Beneficiary is paying from the basic needs portion of his Ontario Works Benefits while simultaneously conceding that utilities are inclusive in the shelter costs the Beneficiary is Entitled to receive!
This is all SO bad for both Multi-Hustle Initiative and Home for Good because not only have they conceded and proved to be receiving utility costs the Beneficiary was paying from the basic needs portion of his Ontario Works Benefits, they proved that this year’s Entitlement Form is entirely fraudulent also! The above Entitlement Form from last year shows that the ‘Actual Rental Cost’ is $1078.00, same as it was in the 2023, 2024 period. It increased from $1040.00 to $1052.00 in November of 2022, and again to $1078.00 in November of 2023. The above Entitlement Notice shows that rent is still $1078.00 as of June, 2025.
Lili the Malevolent Moron Mukalay just asserted to Me in an email that rent is $1104.00 and increasing to $1132.00 in November. If rent is $1104.00 then it looks like they’ve already increased rent for the year by the maximum allowed (2.5%). That means that if what Lili says is True, then rent cannot be increasing again in November because that would be illegal. They can’t increase rent again until November of the following year at the earliest. But more importantly, it just proves that everything presented in the new form is fraud because if rent was $1078.00 in June of 2025, then it can’t be $1132.00 in July of 2025 because that would be twice the amount allowed by law. In fact, it can’t increase to more than $1104.00 until at least July of 2026 if what Lili says is true and rent was increased by the maximum allowed by law in July of 2026.

So if Home for Good is relying on the information they have on hand and the previous year’s submissions, how did rent go from $1078.00 to the $1132.00 they are as King for in their application for subsidy?
There are a number of other reasons why I know the documents that Jason the Courteous Criminal Cooke provided to Me are documents of fraud and what the staff at Home for Good have really been working so hard to fabricate for Me this whole time. I know these documents are fraud because subsidy was cut off three times without notice to Me. Usually I contact the City of Ottawa’s lawyer immediately to let her know and she gets it sorted but refuses to ever acknowledge any wrongdoing on the part of Home for Good, despite the clear and obvious malicious intent of her clients. One year, both Home for Good and the landlord were presumably ‘too afraid’ to let Me know that the subsidy had been revoked, so My rent went unpaid for like ten months or something.
I first learned about it from Lori Simpson (no longer with MHI) and told her that I didn’t even receive notice, so the City Will be liable for failing to Give Me Notice in sufficient time to remedy the situation. I told her that if the City doesn’t agree to pay, I’ll help her sue them for the money for cutting the benefit without notice. She told Me she wasn’t worried about it. Next time I saw Lori Simpson it was roughly ten months later and she was at My door, handing Me a Notice, all smiles, telling Me how nice it was to see Me again (I used to see her quite a bit when I lived on Kent Street because they were trying to sell the property). Perhaps obviously, I presumed the Notice was for the ten months or so of unpaid rent. I’d received a Notice sometime shortly before that letting Me know the unpaid amount had exceeded $10,000.00, seemed logical it might be about time for the landlord to Give Notice, so I reach out to take the envelope.
“Hi Lori, Good to see You, too. If this is about the outstanding rent, I can call the City’s lawyer if the People at Home for Good don’t agree to fix it.”
“Oh, no! Nothing like that! We’re not worried about that, I know We just need to talk to the right People at the City. This is something else…”
And then she continued on with small talk, saying we should arrange to sit down and chat sometime like there was nothing at all to worry about. It was really strange because it genuinely seemed as though she was happy to see Me and that whatever was in the envelope was either negligible or Good news. The Notice was related to My protests of Ottawa public health coming into the community and soliciting tenants. It was also the first Notice I’d ever received related to anything, though it claimed to be the ‘third and final notice’ and that if I did not consent to ostracizing My Self from the community, I would be evicted.
The point is I met Lori Simpson for the final time at Ontario Works to settle the outstanding rent. The subsidy Entitlement Notice shows the break in rent (receiving $0.00 for the relative months) requesting a lump sum payment for the month of September (for like $10k+) of that year and additional monthly payments for the remainder of the year until June – exactly like these forms look when they are increasing rent mid way through the subsidy cycle. Nowhere is the break in subsidy shown in their receipts or the lump sum payment that was made. And if Home for Good asserts these documents are in fact a truthful statement of what they have in fact received from the City of Ottawa in subsidy payments, then the landlord was lying to Me about not receiving rent for those periods and threatened to evict Me for non payment of rent based on an entirely fraudulent accounting ledger created for the tribunal.
Yes, People, lots more fraud to address. If I don’t publish this now, I won’t get it published in time for it to still be the Free Lance Friday Edition, so time to Sign off. I Will revisit this Matter later so We can review just how many of the questions I was as King that Jason the Courteous Criminal Cooke was able to answer. What percentage of the email was gaslighting? We’ll find out in the next edition, but anything less than 100% is a Good start for Home for Good staff!
Love and Blessings,
Discover more from The Kingdom of Heaven Found a Sean
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.