The Continuous Criminal Contempt of Ottawa’s Slumlord Queen, Sarah the Liar Lorenz, MHI

Hello every One and welcome to the Magical Monday Motive a Sean Edition of the Good News Journal, thank King or Queen You for joining Me, it is always a Pleasure to be Gifted with Your Presence. It has been a Magical start to twenty-twenty six in Deed, though I Will be tall King about that much more in Part II of My 2025 Celebrate-Sean and Motive a Sean for 2026. Today We are tall King about property manager and Ottawa’s slumlord Queen for not for profit organization, Multifaith Housing Initiative, Sarah the Lawless Liar Lorenz.

Last week, We were tall King about MHI failing to serve any of their tenants with a Notice of entry to perform routine maintenance of the HVAC (Heat, Ventilation and Air Conditioning) system. The Notice was delivered three hours and thirty-seven minutes after the maintenance team had already completed the work (for the tenants who were kind enough to let them in without lawful Notice of entry) by Kaneesha ‘the Arrogant’ Amethyste who was placed on Notice of Liability for violating the Residential Tenancies Act. Taking no accountability for her own actions as the delivery agent for the principal, Kaneesha instead forwards My email to property manager, Sarah the Lawless Liar Lorenz who also fails to address the Notice of liability and instead accuses Me of ‘aggressive and inappropriate’ conduct and behaviour, presumably for as King of the landlord to respect the Residential Tenancies Act?

Again, You can read about all of that in the first Part of this Story which includes the entirely unlawful Notice sent by Kaneesha by Way of email (which is not legal service of a Notice of entry except by the consent of the tenant). In fact, just for shits and giggles, I’ve got Grok open because I used Grok to paint Sarah the Liar Lorenz in the style of Pinocchio, so let’s put Grok’s unbiased and entirely artificial intelligence to use by as King of Grok what constitutes lawful Notice of Entry under the RTA in the city of Ottawa.

Grok Says:

Under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (RTA) in Ontario (including Ottawa, as no city-specific variations apply), a landlord may lawfully enter a rental unit with written notice given at least 24 hours in advance (section 27), for permitted reasons such as repairs, inspections, or showings. Entry must occur between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. (no notice required in emergencies or with tenant consent).The notice MUST (per section 27(3) and LTB guidelines):

• Be in writing (email/text not sufficient unless agreed).
• Specify the reason for entry (must match a permitted purpose under s. 27(1), with as much detail as reasonable).
• State the date of entry.
• State the time of entry (a reasonable window is allowed, but not an overly broad one like the full 12 hours; exact time preferred where possible).

Service follows general RTA methods (e.g., personal delivery, mail, sliding under door, or as per LTB Rules). Invalid notice allows tenant refusal; violations can lead to LTB remedies.

Doesn’t that sound almost precisely the same as what I told the MHI management and Kaneesha Acting as agent? Is it not appropriate to let the individual who is actually serving the Notice know what constitutes a lawful Notice of entry and provide the individual the courtesy of letting them know they are liable for violating the RTA and tenants are entitled to judicial remedy? Their ignorance opens the corporation up to liability with the LTB or Superior Judicial authority (as the LTB in this case is complicit).

Most individuals Acting as Agents for landlords would appreciate the Notice and accept it as a warning (most would do well to apologize and promise to do better) to avoid personally liability for a repeat of the offense. We can presume Kaneesha does not serve Notices because Sarah the Lawless Liar Lorenz says it is not her department, so perhaps she was ignorant of the requirements, though ignorance is no excuse and the corporate landlord is still liable to the tenant for violating the RTA. That’s what a landlord Acting in Good Faith would do. Instead, Sarah the Lawless Liar Lorenz defames My character based on hearsay allegations Presented to an individual who Wishes to remain anonymous? How about the individual MUST remain anonymous because he doesn’t exist. Sarah just Wished to retaliate against Me for protesting the unlawful Notice of entry which she dismisses as a ‘typo’ regarding the date of entry. Considering that’s the most important element of a Notice of entry, it emphasizes just how incompetent and belligerent Sarah the Lawless Liar Lorenz must be.

But Kaneesha the Arrogant Amethyste is the One who should be thankful because now she knows that her Notice of Entry was not in compliance with the RTA, so she can avoid liability in her personal, private capacity. It is perhaps reasonable for Kaneesha to plead ignorance of the Law and RTA once because she is the ‘community events coordinator’ and her job is primarily to recruit tenants Willing to volunteer their time to save MHI some landscaping and routine maintenance costs with slave labour from tenants who are offered ‘special’ privileges in the community for pledging their free time. It might be reasonable for Kaneesha to plead ignorance on the grounds that she was ‘Trusting’ the property manager would know the Law with respect to Notices of entry and would not be as King of her to serve Notices that violate the RTA.

Now she knows that the property manager was negligent and that email is not legal Notice of entry except by consent. If she is negligent a second time, Kaneesha can no longer plead ignorance and can be held liable in her personal, private capacity because the Rule of Law Will say that should did know (or ought to know) what is required by the RTA because she was Given Notice of her violation previously. So she can only repeat the offense with intent, which makes the Act criminal in nature (because she knows, or ought to know better) and is now trespassing upon the rights of tenants with malicious intent – criminal harassment because they are repeating the offense with impunity. Right, Kaneesha the Arrogant Amethyste? The delivery agent is liable for ensuring the Notice served is in compliance with the RTA – no One else!

Here is the follow up email exchange and evidence of a serial narcissist in Action and demonstration of passive aggressive belligerence courtesy of Sarah the Lawless Liar Lorenz.

It is also fair to Notice that I offered Sarah the Lawless Liar Lorenz an opportunity to explain her Self and to presume the Notice was an egregious error and that they Will make sure future Notices comply with the RTA – no harm, no foul. I also advised her that the accusation she made regarding My behaviour was absolutely false and that if she Will not disclose to Me the name of the individual making the allegation, I would call her a LIAR!!! Hearsay is not admissible in any Court, and any landlord accepting hearsay as fact without getting the other side of the Story is Acting with extreme prejudice by default, especially when the alleged accuser is the individual responsible for as King to enter My unit without serving Me with Notice in accordance with the RTA. This is the definition of retaliating against some One for asserting their rights in accordance with the RTA (and a further violation of the RTA).

Sarah the Lawless Liar Lorenz Passive Aggressive Belligerence:

Good thing I’m not as King for Permission to Publish!!!

Of course, I don’t Imagine there Will be any (meaningful) reply to this email, all Sarah the Lawless Liar Lorenz seems to know how to do is gaslight, ghost People, and Show Case by demonstrable example how incompetent, contemptuous and belligerent they can be. I Will continue to Show Ottawa’s People how morally bankrupt these social posturing narcissists posing as philanthropists really are!

Love and Blessings,