This Remembrance Day, V is for Vindicated!!! The Devil’s Dirty Hands!!!

Hello every One and welcome to the Witches, Wizards and Warlocks Lucky Wednesday Edition, thank King or Queen You for joining Me, it is always an Honour to be Gifted with Your Presence and it is an especially Lucky Wednesday for Casting new Spellings of Magic because We have just successfully defended against MHI’s most morally bankrupt, bad Faith attempt to evict-Sean to date!

V is for Vindicated

There could be no more Significant a day to Remember, Remember that V is for Victory and Vindicate-Sean than November 11th – Remembrance Day! This is the day that I am suggesting four years from now (because four is Found a Sean) the Great Work Will be completed, six days after November 5th of the same year because that is how long it Will take Us to Create God’s Kingdom when We are all on the same Page. On the Seventh day We Will rest.

DISCLAIMER

I have never been correct about timelines, I only know My Words Magically Manifest, so this is an optimistic predict-Sean made with Divine Intent-Sean which I feel is Blessed by this Gift We were Given by God that I have to Present to You today. Remembrance Day. It is a very Good Omen.

The Devil’s Dirty Hands

In fact, the dismissal was so devastating, that Madam Budweth said that even if they had prima facie evidence of the assault, every witness testified that their ‘Community Engagement Coordinator’ threw a coffee at the tenant! Madam Budweth correctly points out that they are admitting to a criminal assault (by upper management) on a tenant – whether in retaliation or not, it is bad faith, a criminal Act and extremely unprofessional. To be attempting to defend such a position Gives Me a very strong case for bad Faith evict-Sean attempts.

“You have no case because You come to Me with dirty Hands.” – Madam Budweth, paraphrasing

Madam Budweth also commented on the seething lack of professionalism demonstrated by MHI’s witnesses. Don’t worry, I’m going to review the entire hearing today so I Will be backing this statement up with direct examples and quotes from the hearing.

Kingdom Accounting of the Keep’s Treasury

Today I’m going to enjoy My Victory. I’ll be listening to the entire hearing for the first time since the hearing and touching on all the little Victories I enjoyed at each interval.

An Ode to Madam Budweth

The toughest part of the Role to Play for adjudicators, justices and judges, liars posing as lawyers and even parasites posing as paralegals standing before or opposing Me isn’t that I technically outrank them on the Record, it’s their ego’s struggle to get over that fact.

All of these People believe they have a very coveted and important Role to Play (which they do) and somehow that clouds their Vision rather than refining it. Any One who comes against Me is always going to Wish to ‘prove’ to Me that they don’t care who I am or what documents I’ve drafted, they were Specially chosen and appointed for their Role so they are not standing down for a Man Appointed ‘by God’. But the Rule of Law doesn’t care what these People have to say about it, My only Duty and obligate-Sean is to Give them Notice of My Trust in God.

I do believe that My Matters were heard by Madam Chair, Christina Budweth because she is a more senior member internally within the Ministry of Justice.

Public & Institutional Standing

• Institutional Trust & Reappointments. She holds cross-appointments across three Ontario adjudicative bodies—the Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB), the Child and Family Services Review Board, and the Custody Review Board. Being reappointed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council to multi-year terms across multiple tribunals reflects standard institutional confidence in her work. [1, 2]
• Peer & Legal Standing. On legal directories such as Lawyers.com, she has no client reviews posted and does not display peer ratings. Her background as former Discipline Counsel for the Law Society of Ontario and former Vice-Chair of the Licence Appeal Tribunal places her in the category of career regulatory and administrative adjudicators rather than partisan or polarizing appointees. [1, 2, 3]
• Litigant & Community Sentiment. On Ontario housing forums like r/OntarioLandlord and r/OntarioRenting, discussions about LTB adjudicators generally focus on systemic backlogs or broad debates over perceived landlord-versus-tenant bias rather than naming her specifically. Public case trackers like LandlordEzy show her issuing standard procedural and merits-based rulings—such as dismissing a landlord’s own-use application in March 2026—without notable public backlash. [1, 2, 3]

“In the LTB ecosystem, having a low public profile is typically seen as a neutral sign. Adjudicators who draw strong reactions online usually do so because of erratic hearing management, frequent procedural errors, or overturned Divisional Court appeals, whereas experienced lawyers with decades of tribunal background tend to run hearings strictly by the Residential Tenancies Act and the Board’s Rules of Procedure.” Divine Angelic Intelligence

Conditional Withdrawal of Application to Divisional Court

I still feel a little bad that I somehow managed to completely mis-Spell the Magic of Isi’s Calling but I Promise it was an Honest mistake I Will correct on My next correspondence. The point is, I was as King of Anna Solomon to Show that the LTB is not aiding and abetting the theft of public money by making sure the next adjudicator I Present to follows the Letter of the Law and does not ignore My evidence submissions.

I am confident that Anna Solomon had a Hand in choosing the day’s adjudicator and that Madam Budweth was chosen because she strictly follows the Letter of the Law. That statement is not included in the audio of the hearing because it was in a pre-amble the Chair made to every One at the start of the day and I remember that she specifically stated that she is not there to be liked, she is there to follow the letter of the law.

Although not all the exchanges between My Self and Madam Chair seem particularly cordial, I did not ever feel like she was trying to ‘railroad’ Me or ignore what I was saying, she was simply asserting her authority. I personally think the attitude and condescending tone is unnecessary, but it doesn’t really bother Me if the Chair is being honest and reasonable – I felt that Madam Budweth always was, even when she was ‘scolding’ Me for tall King too much or letting My cross examination go off course.

However, if You pay attention, I’m not the only One who gets scolded, Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds comes out arguably much worse, especially considering she is a licensed parasite posing as paralegal. I’m not trained in cross examination so I feel One Will Give Me a little Grace on that. I’m not going to spoil it for You, but it really is the most embarrassing display by Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds probably in her entire career. I might even file a complaint against her with the LSO – it never really does much in My experiences, but in this case I can’t see how it could hurt.

Remember, Tribunals Ontario doesn’t have to worry about how morally bankrupt or sociopathic MHI’s slumlord management might be or how much money they have grifted from marginalized minorities, they only have to Show that they are not aiding and abetting the laundering operate-Sean! Tribunals Ontario has a vested interest in protecting the integrity of their institution over its individual players and that’s what I believe is happening right now.

Now, Keeping the context of My Letter to Anna Solomon in Mind, have a listen to the day of the Hearing once again and let Me know if You disagree with My thesis.

My First Present a Sean at the Hearing

I’m going to go over each section and comment on what I feel are the most relevant interactions of each part. This is the Sign in and Preliminary Motion discussions.

Meet Sahada the Satanic Alolo, MHI’s Community Concentration Camp Coordinator

Where is the N5? Proof of Fraud in Service of N5

If You read My response to Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds Evidence Brief You Will Notice that I comment on how absolutely absurd the N5 is and how I doubt very much that the document was ever filed with the LTB because no liar posing as lawyer or parasite posing as paralegal would be stupid enough to try and list a number of perfectly legal and lawful notices regarding the landlord’s betrayal and breach of the RTA as evidence submissions against the tenant!? It is so absurd and ridiculous! Not unless they were trying to lose!!!

However, I Wish to demonstrate that the reason I believe they did this was exclusively to gaslight Me and or cause Me to believe that it doesn’t Matter what legal arguments I make because the LTB is complicit. It was such a self incriminating evidence exhibit that it could only be included if the adjudicator was complicit. I believe they sent it to Me to Give Me a sense of impending doom, causing Me to believe the entire hearing is already decided. It was to demonstrate their impunity, if You Will – an intimidate-Sean tactic.

The Chair asks where the N5 is which is exactly the question I would be as King if I were only looking at the Application that was filed because Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds swears to have served one but doesn’t Give one to the LTB or include it in her EVIDENCE BRIEF to the LTB? Remember how I told You that they serve on Me alone by email because they are serving the LTB with different documents? This is Your proof.

LTB-L-082848-26-MHI Evidence Brief: Starring Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds and Sahada the Satanic Alolo

If the Chair were looking at the same evidence brief served on Me, she Will not be as King where the N5 is, Will she?! The N5 and the Schedule A to go with are clearly listed as evidence exhibits Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds told Me she Wishes to Present! Now You also know why it is so hard for Me to remember that I don’t need to defend against any of those accusations anymore, I am literally only responding to the N6 and N7 – ‘the coffee incident’ and nothing else.

205 pages served on Me (and at the latest possible hour) were for no other purpose than to overwhelm and harass. The Evidence Brief should have included the T2 Application, the N6, N7, service of those documents on Me and the list of witnesses. Everything else was to distract, overwhelm and confuse. This is how belligerent, bad faith liars posing as lawyers and parasites posing as paralegals behave – like spoiled children.

Recording the Proceedings

Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds just barely dodges the N5 bullet because believe Me when I tell You that the Chair was not yet picking up what I was putting down. The Chair doesn’t know she is looking at a completely different evidence brief than what was served on Me. One of the reasons for this is because this is such deplorable conduct no Chair Will believe it, they Will naturally presume I must be wrong. As soon as I said it was two hundred and five pages of information including the N5, Michaela quickly shifts gears and intercepts to tell the Chair that I have been known to Record the proceedings. Distract, deflect.

Trust Expressed

I am ready and well equipped for this tactic now. If they are not as King, I don’t tell (because Canada has a one party recording policy, meaning only one party is required to know a Recording is taking place).

If they do ask, I say that I am and I’m doing so as a Trust obligation and fulfillment of My Oath of Service to His Majesty to ensure the Courts and Tribunals are not being used as cloaks for fraud. When the Chair is as King if I am going to insist on Recording despite her Order, I say…

“Sean. Sean! Stop talking.” – Madam Chair

“Okay.”

“You are not to be Recording this proceeding, so do You, are You telling Me that You are going to insist on Recording this proceeding?”

“I absolutely am and uh, if You Wish to press charges for Me I believe You are violating My right to a fair…”

“Alright, just Give Me a second here, okay?”

“Okay.”

“RECORDING STOPPED” 4:46

This is what it is like to Live in My Microcosm! The Chair vanishes and ‘abandons ship’. This is what judicial authorities do when they need to check on a point in Law. This is also how You know this is a Good Chair. She’s not letting her emotions get the best of her and I’m sure she’s not pleased with Me but the fact is, if I tell her I believe she is violating My rights and she doesn’t concede or at least verify whether or not that is True, she Will be liable because she is expected to know.

Constitutional rights are the highest Law of the Land regardless how much liars posing as lawyers Wish to gaslight and deflect to statutory Law. The Trustee Act is also covered by Statute Law and the Constitution and Charters are actually public Trust documents, so pleading ignorance to Trust Law is actually impossible. Codes, Statutes and Acts are like codicil documents to Canada’s Charters.

I also believe the long pause here is once again because of My Divisional Court Application. Anything that happens here today Will be additional exhibits for My current Application or bartering material to discontinue the Application. They certainly do not Wish to compound the violations I’m outlining in My Application, so I do not at all think it is unreasonable to presume that Tribunals Ontario legal counsel Anna Solomon was likely consulted during this adjournment. The Chair Will also likely be explaining to My opposing counsel that they Will advise I may be fined but Will not prevent Me from Recording (because I am correct on the constitutional question, the Trust has Res Jurisdiction and subject Matter jurisdiction cannot be waived).

“Okay” – Madam Chair, 15:21

Just a little more than ten minutes.

“It is improper to Record the hearing and a violation of the RTA and if You do You may face administrative fines.”

“I’m perfectly fine with that because I told You I am Acting as the Trustee and Executor..”

“I heard You.“

I don’t Wish to Give a Play by Play of the entire hearing but this is very Significant. Madam Budweth is very quick to stop Me from reminding her that I’m a Trustee with a constitutional question before the Tribunal.

The code here is the Word ‘may’ face administrative fines. Maybe I Will but they Will have to be addressed to the Trustee for the Kingdom of Heaven Found a Sean, so probably not. The other Significant Key Word phrase here is ‘I heard You‘ – most important Words Madam Chair says all day (to Me) because she can’t ever say she did not know I was Acting in My Fiduciary capacity – the Trust now applies.

I’m very happy at this point because I don’t care about a commercial fine anyway, it really is a Trust obligation, that’s not made up or contrived. But this is why the constitutional question is not heard as a preliminary motion and pushed back until after the merits of the landlord’s Application!

Why? Because I believe after reviewing the file, checking the Case Law regarding Trusts and considering the grounds I Will have to appeal her decision, she reviewed the Applicant’s materials with a little more scrutiny. If the Chair can dismiss on the merits of the Application having no cause of Action, then My preliminary motions become mute. That was the point. Madam Budweth already knew MHI’s Application would fail on the merits and this was to avoid acknowledging the authority and jurisdiction of the Trust.

That’s My thesis. Tell Me what You think after listening to the outcome of today’s hearing. Also know that is My thesis after the fact, I did not have these realizations or suspicions at the time.

Docket Listing

I just Wish to touch lightly on her comment about not mentioning anything about referencing document numbers because I don’t push back on this but she very much did announce to every One in her morning pre-amble that People must know the document numbers as they are listed in the portal or she Will not be able to see what document You are tall King about.

The reason I point this out is because of the shit show I had with Samar Farhan, the LTB’s Case Processing officer for misplacing, renaming and incorrectly referencing documents in My previous LTB Matters. I got the document list specifically so that I could respond to this direction correctly. When she mentions the same documents I have listed (with the document number beside just to be sure), I don’t really care about the document number anymore because I know she has the two preliminary motions that Matter most.

I feel she pushes back so hard on that point because I have complained about the Tribunal using document numbers that are different from the Title of the documents I sent to the LTB as evidence – I felt she was trying to assure Me that I don’t need to worry about that, she has My documents.

Also, I really don’t Mind her pushing back against Me for overtalking or getting off track because I know that I can and do, and I felt she was legitimately attempting to direct the hearing as efficiently as possible. In fact, I really appreciate some of her direction with witnesses later in the day.

Sahada the Satanic Alolo Takes Center Stage – Part I

Lunch break ends and I am feeling very relaxed and confident going into the afternoon. I know exactly what happened and I know exactly who is testifying and know that at least one of them is going to fall apart in the retelling of their lie.

There was absolutely no Act of aggression by Me toward Sahada at any time – the entire Act of aggression on My part is completely fabricated. Consider that if what I am saying is True, they all have the same Truth with one inserted lie. So if I can focus on the lie and how the lie happened exactly, I believe I can catch inconsistencies in their story and this is what I am trying to do with My questioning, as well as establish Sahada Alolo’s cozy relationship with the Ottawa Police Services.

It’s a little funny for Me to hear My cat calling for Me in the background during the hearing, he gets jealous and I forgot My mic was not muted when I tell him to come! I had to go pick him up to shut him up. They are really not used to Me being so completely distracted for such an extended period of time.

Psychological Advantage

I don’t really Mind having My camera on if they ever ask or insist on it, I wouldn’t push back against turning it on at least temporarily, but they have never asked Me in an LTB hearing so I just don’t turn My camera on. Every One else’s camera is on so I’m the only person in the room who is speaking from a black screen. I admit that I like being somewhat mysterious and feel it Gives Me a psychological advantage. I also get the sense People are afraid to ask Me to turn it on afraid I Will say it’s a privacy violation or something and they probably feel it’s just not worth the hassle as King Me.

Chair Interrogation of Sahada Alolo

You Will Notice that Sahada’s initial testimony before I cross examine is interrupted a few times by Madam Chair to ask Sahada more specific questions. The questions she does ask are extremely relevant because she is determining her Role within MHI and the community which more clearly defines the duty of care to the tenant.

You Will Notice that when she asks Michaela for her evidence brief, she requests the docket number! This is what I was referring to before and what apparently doesn’t apply to Me! Apparently, My documents are directly before her.

Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds Leads Witness

Michaela gets schooled for coaching and leading the witness. Now this is one of those areas where I really do need more practice because I am not at all sure what is proper here. I Keep My mouth shut while Michaela is questioning Sahada because I don’t Wish to get yelled at or seem impatient and rude. I do believe that is proper but I’m not sure how customary it is for the Chair to intervene or if it’s supposed to be Me that mentions she’s leading the witness but this is why I really liked Madam Budweth’s style of adjudicate-Sean. I Wished to ask about leading the witness when I heard Michaela doing this but I said nothing and was very happy to see the Chair calling it out for Me. Many other adjudicators I have seen Will absolutely allow this kind of conduct to persist, Madam Budweth isn’t having any of it!

No Bruises

Before I even get a chance to cross, Madam Budweth starts as King Sahada how she got bruises based on her story which was going to be one of My first questions!!! This made Me very happy because basically what I am watching from this point forward is Madam Budweth noticing all the same Issues I Noticed when first reading the accusations. Coffee does not cause bruises – Good catch, Budweth!!!

Police Report is a Fake

There is no official Record of Sahada reporting to police or she would have provided the incident report and this Chair is no rookie. At this point the Chair is already suspicious, I can see the discernment on her face as she’s listening to Sahada. She is clearly not buying or understanding her story. ‘She chose not to pursue’.

No, I told the investigating officer what Will happen if they do and I never heard from him again.

History of Violence and Discriminate-Sean

In her testimony to Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds, Sahada the Satanic Alolo states that she has never felt so threatened by a tenant that I am the first tenant to cause her to feel so unsafe she can no longer leave her office door open. But the Real genius of Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds is invoked by the Magic of this Spell,

“Can You describe some of the past incidents You are referring to?” – Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds

This line of questioning exposes her guilt more than anything else. Her Voice begins shaking noticeably because she has no previous incidents that were not aggressively initiated by Sahada the Satanic Alolo. If she were Truly so terrified of Me from past incidents, she would immediately start tall King about those incidents in detail to discredit Me. But the only other Real interaction We’ve ever had was when she attacked Me at a Community Garbage Giveaway for My vaccination status and that’s where she eventually ends up taking the converse a Sean! I could not have hoped for better because now I don’t have to find a Way to take the converse a Sean there!