LTB-L-082848-26-MHI Evidence Brief: Starring Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds and Sahada the Satanic Alolo

Liars Posing as Lawyers Informing on Self

It’s incredible to Me that a liar posing as lawyer can be so Self defeating in his submit-Sean’s, but to pass that kind of incompetence onto his parasitic paralegal, Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds is unconscionable.

This is the handiwork of Quinn Thiele Mineault Grodzki LLP, a firm that specializes in aiding and abetting RTA violations and the exploit a Sean of marginalized minorities by not for profit slumlords for the City of Ottawa’s famous ‘ Kickback Scheme’.

A former City of Ottawa housing case worker and a landlord are scheduled to stand trial in June, 2026 in connection with a municipal housing kickback scheme. [1]

Overview of the Scheme

• The Accused: Kim Simon (55, former city housing case worker) and Sandeep Aggerwal (56, landlord). [1, 2]
• The Charges: Both face criminal charges including fraud over $5,000 and breach of trust; Simon is charged with accepting a bribe, and Aggerwal is charged with bribing a municipal employee. [1, 2]
• Timeline of Events:
  • Late 2023: The illicit payments and above-market lease approvals reportedly began between October and November 2023.
  • December 2024: City Auditor General Nathalie Gougeon tabled a report to the audit committee following a tip to the city’s fraud and waste hotline.
  • May 2025: Following police investigations, criminal charges were formally laid.
  • June 2026: The accused are scheduled for a judge-alone trial in the Superior Court of Justice in Ottawa. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Key Details from the Investigation

• The Kickbacks: Forensic reviews by Ernst & Young LLP found $22,000 in payments from the landlord to the employee between November 2023 and October 2024, disguised as “bonuses”. [1, 2, 3]
• Inflated Rents: The case worker directed vulnerable clients into units managed by the landlord at rates significantly exceeding market value—in some instances up to 63% above average (such as a 3-bedroom unit priced over $4,000). [1, 2, 3]
• Impacted Tenants: The audit identified 31 affected tenants tied to the landlord across multiple lease agreements. [1, 2]
• City Response: The employee was fired between October and December 2024, business with the landlord was halted, and transition plans were arranged for affected tenants. [1, 2]

Read more coverage on the Ottawa Citizen or CBC News. [1, 2]

I guess the Liars Society of Ontario is just a criminal organization that uses the profession to engage in what the Common Man calls ‘white collar’ crimes. Stealing from the public purse is the only thing elected officials seem to be Good at – not one elected official generates a single penny for Canada’s economy but demands incredible wages the Canadian People pay for because State Actors don’t know the first thing about managing a Sovereign economy. When One doesn’t know how to manage the public Trust, they have to rely on the People to pay their wages. Every dollar paid to government employees is an unnecessary expense the Canadian People pay for. That’s why politicians join ‘parties’ because it’s not a competence contest, it’s a popularity contest among sociopathic narcissists. They are just there to have Fun and put on a Good Show for the People – they don’t know fuck all about managing a Sovereign country or protecting any One’s inherent rights. In fact, I bet most of Canada’s elected officials can’t even tell You what a Sovereign country is! It’s not Canada, and (sadly) I’m not being facetious or hyperbolic.

The Case of the Incriminating Evidence Brief, Starring:

Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds

Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds is clearly the understudy of Michael the Tyrannical Thiele because their tactics are the same. Give Me all the evidence I require to prove My case, hoping I Will be foolish enough to believe the overwhelming volume of documents is somehow incriminating for Me – it’s not. Not in the least!

Proves Complicity with the LTB

There is no Way any legitimate liar posing as lawyer Will ever Present an evidence brief like this to any legitimate or competent judicial body whatsoever, Tribunal, Court or otherwise. Why?

Well, I’m not going to try and summarize all the idiocy of this submission in a single go, that Will be insane!

But the point is, what I Will be Showing You are evidence exhibits so damning and Self incriminating that every single one of them proves My case on its own!!!

They have twenty-seven evidence exhibits they are hoping to rely on to make their case including two hundred and five pages of documents and one audio Recording (which I am uploading to Spotify now and Will have available to Post here with the rest of the exhibits soon).

Et Voila!!! Now You tell Me if that Recording helps or hurts their position…

I’m going to go over every exhibit to explain to You why every single one is self defeating for them.

Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds Evidence Brief

Tabs

1. L2 Application, filed September 26th, 2026 (LTB-L-082848-26)……………………………………………3-12

The Application is brought by Sarah the Lawless Liar Lorenz and represented by Quinn Thiele Mineault Grodzki LLP‘s parasite posing as paralegal, Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds, LSO #P18919.

I’m guessing their usual liar posing as lawyer, Michael the Tyrannical Thiele is either too expensive to be bribed into filing this ridiculous application so his paralegal understudy was all they could afford, or Michael the Tyrannical Thiele values his repute a Sean as a liar posing as lawyer more than he cares about helping MHI file another bad faith Application that is such a clear and obvious violate Sean of Section 83 of the RTA.

Previous History with Michael the Tyrannical Thiele

Michael the Tyrannical Thiele has a repute a Sean to uphold and already had an interview he did with CFRA 580 Radio removed from the airwaves after I reported that he had misinformed Ottawa’s People by suggesting that slumlords like MHI can refuse to rent to the unvaccinated and require any One to prove their vaccination status when Signing the lease or be refused tenancy! I swear to You he said that (and why the interview Will have been removed – they Will have had a real lawyer review the audio and make an executive call to avoid liability).

This also made his stance on the fascist dictates of the treasonous Trudeau regime during the plandemic perfectly clear – he is an enemy of Canada’s constitution and believes the inherent right of Canada’s People to autonomy over their health care choices is an inconvenience for corporate slumlords and not the highest law of the land. I guess he was playing hooky on constitutional law day?

Let’s remind Michael the Tyrannical Thiele and his parasitic paralegal, Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds what the Purpose of the Residential Tenancies Act is.

Part I

Introduction

Purposes of Act

1 The purposes of this Act are to provide protection for residential tenants from unlawful rent increases and unlawful evictions, [the very first line of the Act indicates the ‘highness’ of the Act’s intent-Sean] to establish a framework for the regulation of residential rents, to balance the rights and responsibilities of residential landlords and tenants and to provide for the adjudication of disputes and for other processes to informally resolve disputes.  2006, c. 17, s. 1.

The reason I put the last line in bold italics is to remind every One (especially adjudicators and Registrars/Case Processing Officers of the LTB) that the hearing is not the only time the LTB can (or should) take Action!

No Willful Blindness Permitted by Act

Absolutely nowhere does it say that the purpose is to watch the abused and exploited tenant upload mountains of evidence of economic exploitation, fraud, money laundering and bad Faith evictions in retaliation for their advocacy before the board and do nothing?! Every person reviewing the file can just plead Willful Blindness to the abuse they have on the LTB Court of Record?! It absolutely astounds Me!

Not even a note on the file, or a stern Word with he slumlord violating the Act at the start of the hearing?

I did a lot of advocacy before the Labour Standards Board in BC when I was war King at a nine to five type gig many years ago now and I can tell You first Hand that they do NOT allow the employer to continue their abuse of worker rights until the day of the hearing. It simply does not happen, complaints are taken very seriously and employers usually remedy to avoid having to go and have an order awarded against them. They know not remedying the breach Will only aggravate the worker’s payout and claim.

They would NOT just pretend they do not see the violations and let it go until the day of the hearing, this is NOT how legitimate tribunals operate and the ‘Purpose of the Act‘ (Acts are always done with Intent-Sean and the purpose IS the Express-Ion of that Intent-Sean; the Fiduciary equivalent of a codicil document to the Trust which is Canada’s Founding Charters) is all I require to prove that everything this slumlord is doing is with intent to cause harm, harass and unlawfully evict a tenant for his advocacy and this public a Sean – specifically Tabs 23-25.

N5 and Notice of Trespass Missing

The T2 Application states that the only documents filed are an L6, L7 and Certificate of Service. The N5 and Notice of Trespass are missing.

To deliberately omit to include the L5 and Notice of Trespass in the T2 Application filed with the LTB is fraud because it is patently untrue!

Canada Post is a (Court) Registry

Remember, I did not receive any of these Notices because they were all returned to sender for contempt of LTB Order to communicate by email exclusively for the purpose of transparency and accountability because they (city of Ottawa and MHI) have engaged in Canada Post mail fraud several times, deliberately mis-Spelling the Magic of My Sacred Calling (for no other reason than to antagonize) and serving Me with ‘redacted’ versions of what they send to the LTB (but Titled exactly the same which makes the fraud particularly hard to catch – one redacted, one not, both named the same).

That’s legitimately how I caught MHI stealing from Me in the first place, courtesy of Michael the Tyrannical Thiele who uploaded the unredacted version to the portal (probably presuming I Will not check that version to see if it is a match for the one he sent Me). The unredacted version showed that not only did I not owe the money the were claiming, they had over $500. more on the account than the one month rent deposit and were adding an extra sixty per month by claiming to pay whatever I was paying for utilities (which was $60/month).

Now, it’s hard for Me to know if the unredacted version he uploaded to the portal was legitimately a mistake (and he had meant to send the LTB the redacted version too (which hides the subsidy theft)) or if it really just proves the LTB is complicit (he didn’t need the redacted version because the LTB is going to launder it through the Tribunal for him any Way (and probably for a tidy fee)).

It’s hard to know because Michael the Tyrannical Thiele withdrew the Application as soon as I pointed out the problem with his ledgers and the LTB had nothing to say about it (Willful Blindness) despite that Application being made in retaliation for complaining about the unlawful N5 served upon Me in 2023! I literally had a rights violate Sean Application before the LTB for the first N5 that was served on Me in retaliate-Sean for My advocacy in the community by Lori the Sellout Simpson during the plandemic.

I’ll speed up My review for each future point but the background is important. This T2 Application is filed by Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds, not Michael the Tyrannical Thiele.

2. Notice of Hearing, issued for November 10, 2026………………………………………………………………13-17

NOTICE OF VIDEO HEARING
Under section 174 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006

File Number: LTB-L-082848-26
Parties to the Application:
Applicant (Landlord) Parties
Multifaith Housing Initiative
Respondent (Tenant) Parties
Sean Von Dehn
Concerning Rental Unit Address: 105, 320 VIA CHIANTI GROVE, NEPEAN, ON,
K2J6J6
Hearing Date: November 10, 2026
Hearing Time: 09:00 AM EST
Hearing Location: Virtual
You can join the video hearing online or by phone. If you have difficulty using one
method, use the other method.
 Join online: An internet connection is required to participate. Join the video
hearing online by clicking on the following link: https://bit.ly/ZLTBVideo124

Hope to see You there!!!

Not much to say here except to point out that this is a required document according to the practice direction and of course the continuous contempt for the Style and Spelling of My name (Spelling of a name is how the Common Man understands the Word, Style is the correct legal term that defines the Way each Letter of a Title is Styled (upper or lower case) on a document – any inaccuracy in the Record of the parties is a fraud on the Court and a violate-Sean of My Sui Juris status as the Trustee for the public Beneficiary). To the layman, this may seem like a trivial detail and that is what liars posing as lawyers Will Wish for the unsuspecting Self Presented Litigant to believe.

It might sound trivial to most, but there is literally no such person as ‘Sean Von Dehn’, it means something completely different in German (and why they refuse to Honour it).

The point is, this is clear and obvious Willful contempt designed to antagonize and something a competent judicial authority Will identify immediately and not tolerate for one second. It never reflects favourably on any liar posing as lawyer being deliberately disrespectful. The fact that they continue to do this on every document when I am so vocal about it, only further emphasizes the malicious intent. If the slumlord can call Me whatever they Wish, then I can Give Stage names to these State Actors, too – they are setting precedence for name Calling and believe it should be tolerated. It reminds Me of the Jack White song, ‘You’re like a little girl yelling at Your brother ’cause You lost his ball…”.

They don’t Wish to Honour My proper name but Wish to complain about the names I call them? That is narcissism by definition, People.

3. Lease Agreement, dated November 12, 2021……………………………………………………………………..18-49

Gold to Keep in the King’s Treasury!

This is such a Gift, I had a hard time believing it was Real! This was actually the very first document of evidence I reviewed because I was sure it Will be a fraud, redacted, illegible… Something. But no. It is the Real deal, the actual lease I Signed. Let’s look at page one.

Page 18 (Page one of Lease)

MHI prepares the contract and names the tenant incorrectly, ‘Sean Von Dehn’. This is the initial tenancy contact so all presumptions must be addressed because these terms are presumed to be agreed by both parties.

Evidence Tampering – The Fragment a Sean of a Tenancy Agreement

It first states that this is a ‘market Value unit’ OR a ‘below market rent (subsidy paid by MHI)’, and the first box is checked (which doesn’t include the ‘subsidy paid by MHI’. That is the last section on Page 1 of the lease.

Consent Form Inserted Into Lease

Ironically, the reason official documents require page numbers is so that People can’t randomly insert a document that is not part of the tenancy or lease agreement it Self without fracturing the chronological Order of the agreement.

Page 2 of the lease (page 19 of Michaela the Lawless Liar Leeds fraudulent Evidence Brief) is suspiciously missing and they’ve inserted a consent form in its place!

Page 18 of the Evidence Brief is page 1 of the lease, 19 an un-numbered, standalone Consent Form, then the lease continues normally with ‘Page 2’ on Page 20! That is not a mistake, a pdf doesn’t just randomly insert a page, it has to be merged into the document with a special pdf merger tool! Deliberate fraud with malicious intent to influence the course of justice!

But why, what is the point? To make it look like I have the obligation to pay rent! By inserting the consent form in between page 1 and 2, One Will think that is the end of agreement concerning liability for unpaid rent, not realizing there are two other options which start the top of Page 2.

This is a ‘Rent Supplement Unit (subsidy paid by City of Ottawa)’, or ‘This is a maximum shelter unit (subsidy paid by MHI)’ – the second box is checked!!! The document was inserted to deflect from the full contract terms related to rent payments because this proves every N4 to evict for non payment of rent was MHI’s liability!!! They just proved they have never had a cause of Action to evict but were trhying deflect by fracturing the lease and manipulating the evidence Record.

Fraus Omnia Vitiate

It’s not a joke, that single Act of deliberate fraud and manipulation of evidence is enough to disregard all other submissions. If some One Will engage in this conduct once, nothing can be Trusted.

Consent Form Signed by King Sean, House von Dehn

They also concede that the Man Signing the Consent Form is King Sean, House von Dehn, not ‘Sean Von Dehn‘, so if they are receiving funds in that name, or sharing that individual’s inform a Sean that is also identity fraud because there is only one person Registered with Revenue Canada to receive these Benefits. They deliberately use a fake name because they Will be claiming tax rebates for the money they stole and they can’t be claiming to pay My utilities because I pay those in the proper name of the Beneficiary! So to get around Revenue Canada, they use a fake name and birthday, reversing the month and day of birth to avert the Registry.

Page 23. Last Month Rent Deposit

Page 23 of the information and Page 5 of the lease states that last month rent deposit is $1040.00 and that the money Will be received before Keys are Given. So why does Sarah Lorenz accounting Show only $950.00 on deposit for Last Month Rent? Doesn’t add up, does it?

Page 44-45 MHI Obligate-Sean’s

Entry of Unit 13.1 – MHI Will make every effort to accommodate Your schedule when needing to enter Your unit

13.2 – MHI may enter Your unit between 8 am and 8 pm with 24 hours Notice

• To check conditions of Your unit? (not lawful)
• To make repairs (True)
• To attend to the management of the building? (not lawful)
• If You have broken the conditions of Your lease (not lawful, breaking a lease does not automatically Give landlord right to enter Your space!)
• For pest control (True)

Only two reasons are actually lawful in accordance with RTA without tenant consent. ‘Management of the building’? What even is that? Fancy Words to try to gain unlawful entry. ‘Breaking a lease’? So if the landlord believes You broke the lease, they can enter the unit? They Will have to have reasonable cause to enter the apartment. Not paying rent on time would be a breach of the lease but it’s not grounds to enter the unit (for example).

Page 47. Non-Discrimination for Tenants and Staff

While they discriminate against Me with extreme prejudice for My vaccination status and advocacy in the community? Rich!

4. N5 Notice to End Tenancy, dated August 28, 2026……………………………………………………………..50-54

I’m not sure what the LTB is doing exactly but below is (allegedly) a screenshot of the official Record of documents uploaded by both parties. Obviously it is not the full Record or they are only uploading some of the evidence submissions?

You’ll Notice the list is in chronological Order, most recent submissions at the top and the date of this email from Samar the Fascist Fraudster Farhan (LTB Case Processing Officer) is dated October 22nd. So where is this N5? Where is the Notice of Trespass? Why is it that the only documents the LTB Shows uploaded to the portal by the slumlord is the initial Application on September 25th and another document dated the same day but sent a month later (almost exactly)?

The first row is the date the document was received by the Tribunal, the second row is the date and time it was officially added to the file or uploaded to the portal (according to LTB Case Processing Officer, Samar Farhan).

I also Wish to point out that this is correct, at least for My submissions. No ‘random’ email communications between My Self and the LTB have been added to the file and none of the names of the documents have been altered. I usually save to pdf but the LTB obviously uses .eml or .msg to save email evidence exhibits. All of the document exhibits in the list were also served on the slumlord as well as the LTB – no ambush litigate-Sean, I’m Acting in Honour.

Compare the above list to what I am complaining about in My last hearing.

You Will Notice that it is impossible for any One looking at this list to know what those exhibits are. The three exhibits that were filed and that I did request for the LTB to upload/accept as an evidence submissions have the Title of the documents entirely cut off!!! How does the adjudicator know there is a preliminary motion to address the bad Faith filing if it doesn’t Show in the list? How can I even direct the adjudicator if the name of the exhibit has changed? Now compare once again to how documents have been accepted for this file.

No ‘Re:’ at the beginning of the Title? I believe the last two emails in the list are the Notice of Hearing but I can’t be sure. I presume they are the slumlord’s submissions but it is impossible to know.

The most Significant point here is the N5 it Self which was never served on Me and (according to Samar Farhan) never received by the LTB! This also applies to the Notice of Trespass. The only reason I discovered any of this without being ambushed was thanks to Samar Farhan on October 20th. Even after confirming that the evidence package of the slumlord’s submissions was missing a Notice of Trespass and N5, Samar Farhan affirmed that the LTB does not have a copy of those documents on file.

Possible reasons the documents are not Present on the LTB Registry? The LTB refused to accept. The slumlord is already filing an N6 and N7 which is what’s called ‘shotgun’ litigate-Sean. When one does not have sufficient grounds to support their N6, they hope to rely on N7 – if N7 fails they are hoping to rely on N5. IF N5 fails, they hope to rely on the unlawful Notice of Trespass to harass Me with police for trespassing in My own community, then they Will have criminal grounds for N6 or N7?

Filing more than one Notice simultaneously is generally a ‘Red Flag’ for the Tribunal alerting to potential bad Faith filings, abuse of process, and malicious intent. The Trespass Notice Will be refused because MHI has no lawful right to Issue one, nor does the LTB have the authority to endorse the unlawful trespass Notice. That has to be Issued by a Court and have legitimate grounds.

Schedule A to N5

You have been served an N5 due to the fact that Your actions have substantially interfered with the landlord’s rights, privileges or interests and the landlord’s reasonable enjoyment regarding the property.

I Wish to place a big question mark here because I’m not sure what these rights, privileges and or interests of the slumlord might be or where they are protected in the RTA?

You have sent several threatening online posts and sent threatening emails to contractors and employees of the landlord, who lawfully attended the property to conduct work. By persistently harassing the contractors and employees, You have interfered with the landlord’s rights and ability to hire and retain contractors and employees to attend and complete work at the property.

Neither MHI or the LTB have any right to complain about what I publish online, that is My right to freedom of express-Sean. They have equal right to launch a ‘We hate King Sean’ website if they Wish but so long as they are in receipt of public money, they are persons of public interest and I have the right to freely express how I feel about them. And as the exhibits Will soon Show, it is not without plenty of warning (Notice) and what each can do to Play their Part on the world Stage more Honourably. I didn’t threaten any One, I said I Will publish their responses to Me and hold them accountable for colluding with criminals and that is precisely what I am doing. I am a Man of My Word.

I didn’t threaten any One. I Gave My Word and it Magically Manifest.

If MHI Wishes to exploit marginalized minorties, I Will exploit MHI.

No work that interferes with the tenant’s enjoyment of the property is ‘lawful’ if it is done in violation of their own lease agreement and the RTA. For some reason, MHI believes the RTA does not apply to them – maybe it is some Three Letter Club One must be in to be above the Law, but violating the RTA with impunity is unlawful and a violate-Sean of the RTA!

• 1. On June 8th, 2026, at 9:42 am, You sent an email to a contractor hired by the landlord making several threatening and racially charged comments.

You tall King about this email?

• 2. On June 8th, 2026 at 10:02 am, You sent an additional email to the same contractor, threatening to include her photograph in an online post.

Are they tall King about this email?

• 3. On June 8th, 2026 at 11:34 am, You sent an email to the same contractor and others, threatening to make defamatory publications and criminal complaints against the contractor and others in the email.

They must mean this email.

I am a Man of My Word.

The Firm on Fraud Hall of Shame: Hebb, Knights and Associates Colludes with Slumlord MHI to Exploit Minorities

• 4. On June 9th, 2026 at 2:20 pm, You sent an additional email to the same contractor threatening them with criminal and civil actions against them.

It’s got to be this email.

On July 10th, 2026, at 4:16, 4:24, and 5:31 pm You sent several threatening emails to the landlord’s employee threatening consequences if they did not comply with Your requests.

I have only one email dated July 10th at 4:16 pm. I’m actually advising the SBT that OW is colluding with the slumlord again, hoping to have Me evicted before the date of the hearing – exactly the ’cause of Action’ for the SBT claim seeking receipts to determine the exact dollar amount the Beneficiary is Entitled to receive in subsidies unlawfully diverted to the slumlord or denied altogether.

This is all in retaliation for the SBT filing and the Notices of liability served upon them in June! To ‘get even’, they collude to cut off My subsidy again – this time with both the case worker and supervisor of Ontario Works ‘ghosting’ the subsidy renewal form, causing the rent to go into default. This is textbook retaliation for exercising My lawful rights and they are Giving Me mountains of evidence!!! The SBT silently observes and says nothing.

And just to prove the converse a Sean didn’t start out badly – wonder why they omit these emails from their Record?

5. N6 Notice to End Tenancy, dated August 28, 2026……………………………………………………………..55-59

6. N7 Notice to End Tenancy, dated August 28, 2026……………………………………………………………..60-63

7. Trespass Notice, dated September 1, 2026………………………………………………………………………………64

8. Certificate of Service for N5, N6, N7 and Trespass Notice, dated September 1, 2026……………….65

9. Workplace Violence Incident Report of S. Alolo, dated August 25, 2026…………………………….66-70

10. Tenant Complaint Form, dated August 5, 2026…………………………………………………………………71-74

11. N5, Certificate of Service and Service Letter, dated January 30, 2023……………………………….75-79

12. LTB Order (LTB-L-069155-26), issued October 7, 2026…………………………………………………………..80

13. Tenant’s Request to Review an Order, dated October 14, 2026………………………………………….81-88

14. LTB Review Order (LTB-L-069155-26-RV), issued October 15, 2026…………………………………..89-90

15. Emails, July 10 to 14, 2026……………………………………………………………………………………………….91-94

16. Emails, July 23 to August 5, 2026…………………………………………………………………………………….95-98

17. Email from Tenant, August 11, 2026………………………………………………………………………………99-106

18. Emails from Tenant, September 24 to 28, 2026…………………………………………………………….107-146

19. Email, October 5, 2026…………………………………………………………………………………………………147-150

20. Emails, October 13 to 14, 2026…………………………………………………………………………………….151-171

21. Emails, October 16 to 27, 2026…………………………………………………………………………………….172-186

22. Voicemail from Tenant, July 26, 2026 (audio recording)……………………………………Now on Spotify

23. Tenant Blog, “BREAKING!!! … Kickback Scheme Hearing”, October 1, 2026 (excerpts)….187-190

24. Tenant Blog, “Tribunal Tribulations … Part II”, October 11, 2026 (excerpts)………………….191-192

25. Tenant Blog, “Tribunal Tribulations … Part IV”, October 16, 2026 (excerpts)…………………193-203

26. Mail Returned by Tenant, received August 18, 2026 (photograph)………………………………………204

27. Mail Returned by Tenant, received September 22, 2026 (photograph)…………………………………205

Okay, this is (perhaps obviously) a work in progress-Sean. I Will be updating all evening so please check back often. I hope to have this Post completed by midnight today but sometimes these things take longer than I anticipate.

Blessings,