Ottawa Criminal Cabal – Mathieu the Repulsive Regimbald’s Continuous Criminal Contempt

The Criminal Framework for Regimbald’s Conduct

Mathieu Regimbald’s actions are not mere administrative errors; they are criminal offenses punishable under Canadian law. The Criminal Code of Canada is unequivocal on this matter:

• Breach of Public Trust (Section 122): Specifically targets public officials who commit fraud or breach of trust in connection with their office duties.
• Trustee Fraud (Section 336): Applies to individuals who are trustees for public or charitable purposes and convert entrusted items with intent to defraud, carrying a maximum penalty of up to 14 years in prison.

Regimbald, as a public servant administering Ontario Works benefits, falls squarely within the scope of these provisions. His deliberate spoliation of documents, failure to properly account for funds, and misrepresentation of facts constitute not just administrative malpractice but criminal conduct that demands prosecution rather than protection.

Documented Spoliation and Fraud

Regimbald’s pattern of document spoliation is not accidental but systematic. Through multiple interactions with beneficiaries, he has demonstrated a consistent strategy of destroying, withholding, or altering critical documents that would expose Ontario Works’ failures to provide entitled benefits. This spoliation serves two criminal purposes:

1. Concealing evidence that beneficiaries are entitled to benefits they haven’t received
2. Creating a fraudulent paper trail that justifies withholding of funds

The housing renewal package incident serves as a prime example. When confronted with evidence that the utility portion of benefits was insufficient, Regimbald not only failed to correct the error but actively participated in spoliating documents that would establish the full extent of the benefits owed to beneficiaries.

The Email Confrontation: A Case Study

In a recent email exchange dated May 13, 2026, Regimbald was directly confronted with his criminal conduct:

“Test run. You’re going to add $3.06 to My next basic needs check (June) because the amount You are providing for utilities is not sufficient to cover the cost and I am entitled to have the FULL COST OF UTILITIES COVERED BY THE HOME FOR GOOD SUBSIDY.

So You owe Me. $3.06 plus the remainder of the subsidies stolen from Me while they were being paid to the landlord instead of Me. I have been entitled to these benefits since the Beneficiary acquired housing and You are liable to Me for any amounts I have not received and guilty of breach of Trust for lying to Me about the Benefits I am Entitled to receive for over six years.”

This email further warned:

“If You don’t show up at the SBT with the Letter of Attorney, the Writ of Mandamaus for Health Care, a copy of the Trust Instrument and Declaration, You Will be looking at four counts of spoliation with criminal intent to pervert justice and trespass upon a Trust Instrument on Record with MOJAG.”

Regimbald’s response was not corrective action but further obstruction—classic behavior for a public servant engaged in criminal conduct.

The Complicit Nature of the Social Benefits Tribunal

The Social Benefits Tribunal (SBT) was established to provide oversight and protection for beneficiaries when administrative bodies like Ontario Works fail in their duties. However, the SBT has become complicit in the very fraud it’s meant to prevent. This complicity is demonstrated by:

1. Systematic dismissal of legitimate beneficiary complaints
2. Failure to order production of spoliated documents
3. Appointing decision-makers who have documented conflicts of interest
4. Creating procedural hurdles that prevent justice rather than facilitate it

This institutional corruption reached new heights with the promotion of Jamie Min to the SBT. Min, already documented in multiple cases as using the courts as a cloak for fraud—including in your father’s estate matter—represents exactly the type of compromised individual who would protect bureaucrats like Regimbald rather than hold them accountable.

Jamie Min: From Estate Fraud to Tribunal Protection

Jamie Min’s promotion to the SBT cannot be examined in isolation from her track record at Naimark Law. In the estate matter involving your father, Min demonstrated:

• Failure to properly serve legal documents
• Submission of incomplete or inadmissible evidence
• Misrepresentation of facts and legal precedents
• Disregard for procedural deadlines
• Hostility and unprofessional conduct

These behaviors are not mere incompetence but deliberate strategies to obstruct justice—exactly the skills the SBT apparently values in its adjudicators. The message is clear: loyalty to the system matters more than commitment to justice.

Find all the liars posing as Lawyers that are war King for the criminal enterprise monopolizing Canada’s Courts with criminals, the Liars Society of Ontario here.

All Liars Posing as Lawyers Colluding in ‘Tiffany, Tanja, Michael and the Magnificent Estate Fraud Con’s Piracy