Notice of Fine and Fee Schedule for Administrative Negligence

To Whom this Gift of Present a Sean May be Gifted,

It is 3:30 at the time I Write this follow up email to My Urgent Mandamus for an Order to compel performance in compliance with existing standing Orders before the LTB and SBT capable of providing immediate relief to My Beneficiaries.  I advised this ‘Honourable’ Court that every moment of administrative delay is causing Real, aggravated harm to My Beneficiaries. 

That is almost eight hours since some One has recieved this Mandamus and done nothing?  No reply at all in response to an URGENT MANDAMUS to put a stop to aggravated harm becoming an Beneficiary?

Contra Bonos Mores!!!

Section 24(1) does not extend the basic jurisdiction of the courts and tribunals; its applicability depends on a Jurisdictional basis external to the Charter itself(Singh v. Canada (Minister of Employment & Immigration), [1985] 1 S.C.R. 177 at page 222).

Key Word being ‘external‘.  The Trust inherits Jurisdiction, You are an inferior Court with an Administrative Order before You!  

This is not a Matter see King re-View, it is a Mandamus that Demands performance!  Failure to perform in accordance with the Direct-Sean’s provided to You is further obstruct-Sean of Justice causing aggravated harm to My Beneficiaries!  This is not acceptable!!!

Mandamus is available in exceptional circumstances, where a specific Action by the executive is the only response capable of remedying the unconstitutionality (PHS Community Services Society, supra, at paragraph 150).

A provincial offences court can grant legal costs against the Crown for conduct in a criminal or regulatory prosecution that constitutes, at a minimum, “a marked and unacceptable departure from the reasonable standards expected of the prosecution” in violation of the Charter (Dunedin, supra, at paragraph 87). 

An award of costs against the Crown in criminal and regulatory matters for violating an individual’s Charter rights is appropriate when the Crown’s conduct threatens trial fairness but may not warrant a stay of proceedings (Dunedin, supra, at paragraphs 80-89).

The superior courts of each province have constant and concurrent jurisdiction to hear section 24(1) applications to ensure that there is always a court of competent jurisdiction (Rahey, supra, at pages 603-604; R. v. Mills, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 863, at page 956; Weber v. Ontario Hydro, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 929, at page 962; Canada (Attorney General) v. McArthur, [2010] 3 S.C.R. 626 at paragraph 14). They are the “default” courts of competent jurisdiction (Doucet-Boudreau v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Education), [2003] 3 S.C.R. 3 at paragraph 45). 

Basically, in the clearest, most concise English I can articulate to You, You do not have any legitimate administrative reason for delaying My Beneficiary’s remedy, failure to do so is simply administrative negligence causing harm for which the Crown Will be liable as a result of whichever clerk received this Mandamus and decided it was no big deal.

So I am going to be imposing a fine of one ounce of Silver for every hour You delay My Beneficiary her remedy, and one ounce of Gold for every day.  That sounds fair.  You don’t care about the harm You are causing?  Maybe You Will care more about Your liability.

You don’t seem to speak the Language fo the Heart (He-Art), but I know You Love money, so Your negligence and the aggravated harm You are causing My Beneficiary Will cost You.  

Just to be clear, if You gaslight Me until Friday, 4:00, You’ll owe My Beneficiary four ounces of Gold and sixteen ounces of Silver.

Please make sure this Mandamus reaches Superior Court Justice Sally A. Gomery, she is waiting to hear from Me and I am tired of the obstruct-Sean.

She is also the trial coordinator in two civil Matters concerning Trust property, 21-86802 and 22-89835 and both of those Matters require a Motion to Settle the Order. The fee schedule applies until My Beneficiary receives her Remedy.

Blessings,